The U.S. Constitution: Pragmatism versus Textualism on the Supreme Court with Justice Stephen Breyer and Robert Siegel

Join former Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer and Robert Siegel, former host of NPR’s All Things Considered, in a fascinating Moment Magazine discussion exploring the crucial debate of pragmatism vs. textualism in constitutional interpretation.  

Justice Breyer, renowned for his pragmatic approach, offers invaluable insights into:

• The key differences between textualism and pragmatism in understanding and applying the Constitution.  
• Historical and modern applications of these philosophies, with a focus on the Second Amendment as a case study.
• The crucial role of judges in balancing the law with the real-world impacts of their decisions.
• Major paradigm shifts in Supreme Court history and their implications for the future.
• The importance of understanding opposing viewpoints and fostering compromise in public life.
• Encouraging youth engagement in civic participation and public discourse.

Key Takeaways:

• Discusses pragmatism vs. textualism in constitutional interpretation.  
• Examines historical and modern applications of the Second Amendment.
• Highlights the role of judges in balancing laws with societal impacts.  
• Reflects on major paradigm shifts in Supreme Court history.
• Advocates for understanding opposing viewpoints and compromise in public life.  
• Encourages youth engagement in civic participation and public discourse.

Watch now to gain a deeper understanding of these critical legal philosophies and their impact on American society.

Subscribe to the Moment Magazine YouTube channel for more insightful discussions on culture, politics, and society.

Sign up for Moment’s upcoming Zoominars—and watch all our past events—here!