Moment Debate | Should the Supreme Court Outlaw Affirmative Action?
Yes, if what you mean is outright racial preferences, that is, bonus points for being a certain race.
Yes, if what you mean is outright racial preferences, that is, bonus points for being a certain race.
Abortion bans are predicated on assumptions about when life begins that have specific Christian theological assumptions baked into them.
Democracy entails more than merely majority rule. It implies concern about minority rights.
It’s incompatible with the essence of a liberal arts education.
Not as an abstract principle, true any time, but I approve of the tax and spending program proposed by President Biden, and I’m prepared to defend it on moral grounds.
We’re living with an unprecedented threat to free speech, with much of today’s public discourse controlled by a handful of companies with unsurpassed wealth and power—companies whose capitalization values exceed the economies of major developed countries.
What undermines democracy is the use of electronic surveillance by government without tight limits: judicial oversight, transparent policies and publicly available information after the fact.
Yes, but the more difficult question is, what kind of changes do we want? The police and science have made great strides in preventing crime.
“I don’t think there’s a lot of evidence that the U.S. response to the pandemic was disappointing because the government was too small.”
Steven Israel and Norman Coleman weigh in.
In the previous issue, Moment asked David Dayen and Stuart M. Butler to debate whether there should be Medicare for All. Dayen said yes; Butler said no. Here, they respond to each other’s arguments.
We asked Russell Roberts and Harold Meyerson.