Ultra-Orthodox Power Grows in Brooklyn
All politics is local, as Tip OâNeill famously said, and it turns out this is especially true among the ultra-Orthodox. Observers had wondered if American haredim would have any detectable response in New Yorkâs September 10 Democratic primary to the much-publicized sexual antics of candidates Anthony Weiner (for mayor) and Eliot Spitzer (for city comptroller). Apparently not. At press time, though courted by both candidates, the community seemed focused on two seamy policy priorities of its own. One is the degree of willingness candidates express to block regulation of metzitzah bâpeh (MBP), a controversial circumcision practice with shocking health implications; the other, the reelection of a district attorney widely seen as soft on haredi sex offenders.
Haredim in Brooklyn and in New Yorkâs other boroughs have pressed candidates to reverse the minimal health measure imposed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg on MBP, the direct mouth-to-penis suction done (primarily) by haredi mohels after they cut off the babyâs foreskin. MBP can transmit the virus for herpes simplex 1 (HSV-1). Because neonates have weaker immune systems, they run the risk of becoming severely ill, and once infected they carryâand transmitâthe virus for the rest of their lives. MBP-transmitted HSV-1 infections have caused at least two deaths and one case of severe brain damage in the city over the past decade and put other babies in the hospital for days or even weeks. A documented history of MBP-related deaths and epidemics stretches back to the early 1800s.
After years in which haredi rabbinic leaders promised to self-regulate and didnât, New York City instituted a requirement that parents sign an informed consent document before MBP is done on their baby. Haredi rabbinic leaders responded with outrage, labeling Bloomberg everything from a Nazi to a self-hating Jew. They also filed suit against the city in federal court, alleging that the cityâs informed consent requirement was a violation of their right to practice their religion freely.
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that freedom of religion does not mean religious groups can put children at risk. Noted appellate attorney Nathan Lewin, who has successfully argued many freedom of religion cases for the Orthodox and haredi communities, recently told the haredi news website Vos Iz Neias (VIN) that he turned down the MBP case because it is ânot unreasonable, even in the area of religious observance, for the city to require parents to sign a form that says that their eight-day-old baby can have this controversial procedure performed . . .[it] falls within the kinds of things that are ordinarily regulated even if there is a religious duty attached.â
Haredi rabbis have pursued the suit anyway. Meanwhile, though, they have extracted promises from all the mayoral candidatesâexcept, to her credit, Christine Quinnâthat, if elected, they would find ways to mitigate or even cancel the informed consent requirement.
The other notable haredi behavior this election has been the communityâs continued loyalty to 79-year-old Kings County (Brooklyn) district attorney Charles Hynes, challenged in the primary by former federal prosecutor Kenneth Thompson. Hynes has been criticized for years for his deep ties to haredi rabbis and his alleged resulting reluctance to prosecute haredi crimes, particularly sex offenses. Lately he has been hit by scandal after scandalâfrom fundraising quirks, to patronage positions in his office, to an Orthodox prosecutor in one of those patronage positions making appointments with hookers from his office phone, to an allegedly corrupt prosecutor who has been castigated by judges for withholding exculpatory evidence from defendants.
Hynesâs opponent was endorsed by the cityâs largest union, the entire Brooklyn Congressional delegation and powerful haredi State Assemblyman Dov Hikind. (Because of the way New York ballots work, Hynes can run in the general election on the Republican line regardless of the primaryâs outcome.) Even so, at press time, Hynes remained the Brooklyn haredi rabbisâ favorite. City Councilman David Greenfield, long seen as a mouthpiece for haredi rabbinic groups, warned haredim that Thompson, who is African American, was an anti-Semite who would âtarget Jews.â Greenfield made the remark with Hynes at his side, surrounded by supportive haredi leaders.
Critics say haredi leaders support Hynes because he under-prosecutes haredi criminals in return for haredi bloc votes. The two supposed exceptionsâHynesâs prosecution of accused pedophile Rabbi Baruch Mordechai Lebovits in 2010 and of Satmar counselor Nechemya Weberman last yearâboth actually support that claim. The Lebovits conviction was overturned on appeal on a technicality, while Hynes spent much more effort and publicity bringing extortion charges against whistleblower Samuel Kellner, who had brought Lebovitsâs alleged victims to the district attorney.
Weberman, convicted of sexually abusing a young girl from ages 12 to 16, got a lengthy jail term. But not before the victim and her family had withstood an onslaught of harassment, intimidation and apparent witness tampering from within their Satmar communityâactions that Hynes has failed to prosecute with any vigor. None of the four Satmar Hasidim arrested for coercion, bribery and related crimes in this case will serve any prison time.
Traditionally, haredi voting patterns donât reflect candidatesâ views on specific issues but rather the rabbinic leadersâ sense of the candidatesâ loyalty. They convey this judgment to their followers by the way they receive candidates who come calling. This election is no exception, despite the sleaze. A well-connected Hasid told me recently that all Brooklyn politicians are bad, Hynes included, and dirty deals happen; but Hynes isnât the worst, and heâs been our friend, so why change now? Hynes, of course, doesnât see it that way. He attributes his widespread support from haredi rabbis as a reward for his good outreach skillsâand to his childhood stint as a Brooklyn neighborhood âShabbos goy.â
Shmarya Rosenberg blogs at failedmessiah.com
One thought on “Opinion | Shmarya Rosenberg”
Extremism in religion ,as in all human affairs is responsible for much human
misery throughout the ages. We as a people,as a religious sect,have been the
target of extremists,that we now include a group whose power grows is a fact
that could be costly to us as a community,and as individuals. To paraphrase
a forgetable moment in American politics,”extremism in defense of religion is
no virtue.