Cantor’s loss: The Jewish factor

By | Jun 12, 2014
Latest
Eric Cantor and the Capitol Building

 

ERIC-CANTOREric Cantor, the House of Representatives’ majority leader and only Jewish Republican, has officially been buried. One day after a stunning loss to Tea Party challenger Dave Brat–who ran an aggressive campaign vowing for free-market change and denouncing Congress’s bipartisan budget deal–the high-potential politician announced that he would resign his leadership post. Pundits and policy makers have wasted no time shoveling in the dirt, offering myriad explanations for the inevitability of Cantor’s fall from grace (despite nobody having predicted it beforehand). Many have homed in on one component of Cantor’s demise: the Jewish factor.

The New York Times argued that Cantor’s Jewishness had become a liability:

David Wasserman, a House political analyst at the nonpartisan Cook Political Report, said another, more local factor has to be acknowledged: Mr. Cantor, who dreamed of becoming the first Jewish speaker of the House, was culturally out of step with a redrawn district that was more rural, more gun-oriented and more conservative.

“Part of this plays into his religion,” Mr. Wasserman said. “You can’t ignore the elephant in the room.”

While many Jews didn’t agree with Cantor’s views (about 70 percent identify as Democrats), Democratic media strategist Steve Rabinowitz still told The Washington Post that his loss was still a blow to the tribe:

“He is not just Jewish, but proudly so. He wears it on his sleeve,” Rabinowitz said. “If you talk with partisan Democrats, they are rolling on the floor holding their stomachs, and partisan Republicans are very sad. But the mainstream of the community is also sad.”

“The partisan in me can’t help but be amused,” said Steve Rabinowitz, a Democratic media strategist who worked in Bill Clinton’s White House and now serves many Jewish organizations. “But the Jewish communal professional in me thinks it’s not a good thing for the community.”

On both sides of the aisles inside the Beltway, Washington Jews also expressed regret for Cantor’s loss:

Republican Jewish Committee  president Matt Brooks told Politico the loss was “one of those incredible, evil twists of fate that just changed the potential course of history.”

“There are other leaders who will emerge, but Eric was unique and it will take time and there’s nobody quite like Eric in the House to immediately fill those shoes,” Brooks said. “I was certainly hoping that Eric was going to be our first Jewish speaker.”

In 2009, Moment profiled Cantor’s ascent to highest-ranked Jewish Republican in the history of the U.S. House. First elected in 2001, the Virginian quickly distinguished himself for his legislating skills and flexibility while remaining loyal to his constituents. From Southern Jewish boy to House minority whip, his ascent was seen as meteoric and, at the time, a sign of renewed vitality for the GOP.

In the article, Cantor never shies away from addressing his identity as both Jewish and Republican:

“It’s been an interesting sort of upbringing, being a Republican and being Jewish, but I found it allowed me to see America at its best.”

“Jews and Americans of every extraction can find under the GOP umbrella a party very willing to include them.”

 On his observance:

“I maintain a somewhat kosher lifestyle,” says Cantor, who considers himself a Conservative Jew but worships at Keneseth Beth Israel, an Orthodox congregation in Richmond. “I don’t eat any non-kosher meat or chicken. I’m basically a vegetarian when I eat out.”

On Reagan:

“Reagan was my inspiration,” says Cantor, who was 17 when the Gipper was elected. “I wasn’t even old enough to vote yet, but somehow he sparked something in me.”

“The way that I saw Reagan demonstrate leadership was that he had his set of principles, and it wasn’t that he was so adherent to them that he couldn’t bend, or talk to anyone else. He was artful in applying those principles and in coming up with solutions to problems.”

In a Wednesday press conference, Cantor once again connected his Judaism to his political outlook:

“You know, growing up in the Jewish faith, you know, I grew up, went to Hebrew school, read a lot in the Old Testament, and you learn a lot about individual setbacks. But you also read and you learn that each setback is an opportunity, and that there’s always optimism for the future. And while I may have had a — suffered a personal setback last night, I couldn’t be more optimistic about the future of this country.”

7 thoughts on “Cantor’s loss: The Jewish factor

  1. Tex Geoas says:

    Attributing a Jewish factor to Cantor’s loss is just… NUTS.
    I doubt 1 out of 30 people even knew he was Jewish.
    Nuts…

    1. Lebele says:

      Agree. Attributing the loss to Jewishness, or to significant redistricting, are silly in this instance. The district boundaries lost some traditionally conservative counties in the NW, and gained a bit of rural area in the SE. The bulk of vote margin for his opponent was in areas inside the same congressional district in the last decade, and not new areas.

      The SE part of the district is pro-gun and anti-immigration, so perhaps a culture issue for any city boy. But the most populous part of that area was always in the congressional district during Cantor’s tenure.

      Cantor ignored his constituents leading up to the election; permitted attack ads that gave his unknown and under-funded opponent name recognition and credibility; attacked a college professor (how stupid); skipped routine home-town political gatherings; flip-flopped on traditional conservative vs. tea party issues depending on which way the wind was blowing; had no legislation to his record; did not use his senior position to help the district with projects. That combination would have wrecked a Fundamentalist.

  2. pkbrandon says:

    He was elected despite the fact that he’s Jewish, and lost despite the fact that he’s Jewish.
    He’s not the first, nor will he be the last, Republican who’s too sane for the people that are hijacking the GOP.

  3. Martha Schmidt says:

    Judaism had nothing to do with it. He sold out his values and constituents.

  4. Alan Tepper says:

    Eric Cantor was a practitioner of the current brand of Conservatism that played to the cultural concerns of the Tea Party followers on the campaign trail but governed for the elite 1 per centers who payed the freight.

    His constituents merely caught on the the shell game and wanted no more part of it.

  5. STEVEFROMPOTOMACMD says:

    So Jewish liberals who can’t stomach a Jewish Republican (possibly with the exception of Jacob Javits) now think that Cantor lost the primary vote because he is a Jew. What a hoot!!!

  6. Eliezer Segal says:

    After the civil rights movement, the bipartisan system has begun to bifurcate radically on both sides of the isles. Whereas, the Democratic Party has regrouped and moved closer to the center in recent times, the Republican Party has shifted more to the right of right. It’s not surprising that Eric Cantor lost his seat, as he did not adhere to the most intransigent and radical element of his party of choice. I believe that the Jewish people should start their own party. May I suggest its name :
    REJEW V’ NATION. The Chosen Party !

    Amen,

    Eli’S

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *